Modern Day Hyper-inflation

Hyperinflation is a rare occurrence which only happens when normal inflation becomes out of control, for example, in Germany during The Great Big Sad (The great depression), Today some countries are experiencing hyperinflation such as Venezuela. While a small country may seem to have little impact on the global scale the hyperinflation of Venezuela has political, economic, and social impact worldwide.

One of the early political factors that led to Venezuela’s hyperinflation is the election of a communist leader who claimed a dictatorship after running on a democratic socialist platform named Nicolás Maduro in 2014. This was the beginning of Venezuela’s downfall. After Maduro became President of Venezuela, the country lost its main source of income, oil, due to a mass influx of oil from their rigs which caused the price of oil to drop. This was compounded by a lack of infrastructure that caused maintenance on the oil rigs to be substandard. Oil prices dropped to less than ten dollars per barrel. As a political response to this economic crisis, Maduro ordered the printing of Venezuelan currency which started the hyperinflation of Venezuela. The hyperinflation would rise to nearly 1,000,000% at its worst point in 2018. This then caused the economic structure of Venezuela to fall further into disarray. The dropping of their economy caused the world’s oil prices to rise because suddenly President Maduro decided to withhold all oil exports from Venezuela in a fruitless attempt to stop hyperinflation. The people of Venezuela also began using US currency which further caused the Venezuelan currency to become worthless. The political and economic factors that led to hyperinflation not only affected Venezuela but also had a worldwide impact economically with higher oil prices leading to higher gasoline prices and inflation in the transportation of goods and services. Additionally, Venezuela’s government was found to be corrupt as many other formerly communist and socialist nations were found to be and, in turn, caused their downfall, unlike some socialist countires. Venezuela’s downfall made other countries scared to explore the idea of democratic socialism. After the world’s oil prices rose it caused a very anti-communist and anti-socialist scenario around the world sense Maduro caused the mass price increases in oil. In turn, socialists and communists in America began to be criticized heavily because of a lack of knowledge of the two economic/political beilefs.

Venezuela’s recovery from hyperinflation is incredibly slow because of the political and economic issues that ruined their country for almost a decade. The country has become a warning to other societies worldwide, proving that even small countries can have huge impacts across the world.

Drones Taking Farmers Jobs

Farmers are starting to use drones in multiples states here in the U.S.A., but while some farmers are ecstatic about the idea, other farmers are opposed to the idea of the usage of drones. Some of the reasons why Drones should not be used in agriculture include that they could cause plane crashes or accidents from improper usage of drones. The Federal Aviation Association (FAA) reports that this has already happened; for example, in 2015 a “Hobby drone” flew too close to helicopters that were putting out a forest fire in California and grounded the helicopters. Also, a Drone supposedly collided with a passenger jet in 2016 while it was landing at an airport. Another problem with drones is that they could cause damage to vehicles if they were flying too low on the ground. One man’s car was even hit with a drone breaking the windshield. Another problem with drones is privacy issues. Many surveillance drones today have already been used to record unsuspecting people with video cameras; some of these types of drones can be purchased fully equipped straight off the shelves.

As for farming, one of the biggest problems with drones is that it is taking farmers’ jobs, such as crop duster pilots and also cow herders who keep track of cattle. Soon enough, once corporate farming businesses are given FAA permission to use drones, farmers will not have a need to employ workers unless they are drone operators. Additionally, the drones would reduce the farming industry workforce because fewer workers would be needed to cover the amount of space a drone could cover. This could cause more farmworkers to lose their jobs.

Many places are already banning drones from airspaces that are private or in flight paths, and many are worried about what problems drones might cause. This, compounded with the reduction in workforce moving towards a technological alternative to people working the fields or herding livestock, is why drones should not be used in agriculture.

Catchy Title No.1

The most dangerous game is a book about a man named Rainsford. Rainsford is on a trip to Brazil to hunt jaguars and he is knocked over the boat he is on and swims to an island known to be cursed by sailors. He wanders the shore until he comes upon a giant house owned by General Zaroff who was an illegal part of Russian nobility before the communists took over. at first, Zaroff is an amazing host till he tells Rainford that he hunts humans on his island and that Rainsford is the next person he is going to hunt. Then Rainsford is hunted for three days and kills Zaroff after the three days. he then goes on to sleep in Zaroffs bed at the end of the story.

This story can be compared to modern-day hunting since it is what brought about Zaroff Hunting Rainford. People today say that hunting helps with the population of animals and also helps people eat what they like too. it also provides exercise for people who hunt since it requires moving for long amounts of time also it shows skills that are very good to know such as tracking. But in the most dangerous game general Zaroff uses dogs to hunt Rainford rather than the normal form of tracking, this does make it easier to find Rainford as well. Also comparing the book to modern-day hunting Many people disapprove of human hunting AND normal hunting. These are just a few of the small things that the two can be compared to each other.

The Scarlet Ibis

The author of Scarlet Ibis wanted the theme of the story to be what you want to be, no matter what someone else thinks, and to live up to your own expectations, not others. The reasons behind this are that doodle died from trying to live up to the expectations of his brother and family. The narrator of the story, doodles brother, says that he was ashamed of his brother for having little brain functions. He later tells this to doodle which makes doodle strain himself to stand up and continues straining himself to impress his family. His brother then teaches him to be athletic like he is and breaks him down when doodle shows weakness and strain. One day after school they get in a rowboat and doodle strains himself until a storm comes when his brother runs ahead of doodle to the house and when his brother comes back to find him they find that doodle had died from exhaustion and probable heart implosion.

Three reasons why Boxing is safer then Football

Boxing fatalities from July 1990 – June 2010 are said to be only twenty-two boxers compared to Footballs two-hundred and forty-three fatalities between the two dates.
Some reasons that show Boxing is safer the football are the Impact surface area, the environment control, and less contact within the year than boxing. This can be backed up by a former NFL player who is now a heavyweight boxer His name is Ray Edwards. “It might sound crazy to some people but for sure I believe boxing is a safer sport than football now,” Edwards told Yahoo! Sports. “Football is the only sport that is 100-percent injury prone, you don’t know what is coming, where you are going to get hit, how you are going to get hit,” he continued. “You play for a long time, chances are you are going to tear your MCL or ACL. You can break your leg, snap your femur, break your arm, break your neck.” some of you may be asking what about in boxing? You see fighters who are battle-worn and beaten all the time in boxing as well as they get concussions. Well Edward responds, “In boxing, you know where the hits are coming from – it is the guy stood in front of you, in boxing, you might break your hand or break your nose and if you get knocked out you can get a concussion. But also, the referee is right there and you are more protected. In football, you never know. The game moves at such a pace that you might never see it coming. You can get hit when you are completely defenseless.” Along with this Boxer’s statement, Doctors can come to an agreement with that boxing is a more controlled environment such as Dr. Jeffry Kutcher who says, “I would have to agree that boxing is a more controlled environment, It is an individual sport and you see what is in front of you. Medical personnel is right there at ringside and can stop a fight, you have one medical professional who has his eyes on the two fighters at all times.”

Picture of Ray Edwards, a former NFL player who is now a Pro Heavyweight boxer.

The next reason to look at is the surface area to contact the area of the two sports as well as padding. In boxing, you have about six inches of contact across a glove with one to two inches of padding between your knuckles and the opponent’s face or rib cage with only half the opponent’s body weight behind it. Also, some sparring boxers wear padded helmets with about two inches two-three inches of padding. whilst in football, you have about eight inches of hard plastic with two to three inches of padding on the inside of the helmet to cushion the blows from the outside with nearly all the bodyweight of one or more opponents hitting you at once which is going against body padding made of hard plastic and one to two inches of padding. and this is only covering the upper body, the lower body has only half an inch of hard padding and the feet have no padding against the lower end of the cleats while in boxing you do not have to watch for lower body hits at all unless you are fighting a dirty boxer.

Two boxers in sparring gear
A football player in full gear.

The third and final reason is the number of times in a year each of them would be in a match or game, professional boxers only fight TWO TIMES each year on average and each of those matches only goes on for forty-five minutes at there longest! whilst football players usually play every few days or weeks for 3-4 hours in a game. Boxers simply dont get hit as often as football players each year. These are the reasons why boxing is safer than football.

Would you box instead of play football?
https://forms.gle/BDXNcNDV3XBD3U5y8
answer on this website.